GEO Agent – Generative Engine Optimization for the AI Era

This hackathon is about building the GEO Agent, an AI-powered system that measures and improves a brand's Share of Model (SoM) — the percentage of AI-generated answers in which a brand is mentioned.

This is a live-fire hackathon challenge with strict live data requirements.

1. The New Reality: From SEO to GEO

For 20+ years, brands have competed for Google's 10 blue links (traditional SEO).

Today, users increasingly ask AI models directly:

• "What are the best international business programs?"
• "What's the best CRM for startups?"
• "What consulting firm helps international students get U.S. jobs?"

LLMs like ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude return one synthesized answer.
If your brand is not in that answer, you effectively do not exist in that user's consideration set.

This gives rise to a new metric:

• Share of Model (SoM): The percentage of AI-generated answers in which your brand is mentioned.

Your mission: Build the first version of a tool that measures and improves a brand's SoM.

2. Problem Statement

Today, brands generally:

• Don't know whether AI models mention them
• Don't know which competitors are being recommended
• Don't know why those competitors rank
• Don't know what content to create to fix it

You are building the GEO Agent — a live AI consultant that:

• Audits a brand's Share of Model
• Explains why the brand and competitors rank as they do
• Recommends concrete actions and content to improve SoM

3. Brand Scope – Choose ONE Real Brand

Pick one real company with an actual digital footprint:

• Option A: Global Brand
  • Examples: Nike, Coca-Cola, Airbnb, Stripe, etc.
• Option B: Tech Startup
  • Examples: Linear, Notion, Retool, Webflow, Ramp, etc.
• Option C: Education / Program Brand
  • Examples: Semester at Sea, General Assembly, NYU Florence, etc.

No fictional companies.

4. GEO Agent MVP Requirements

The GEO Agent must convincingly answer two core questions:

1. How well is my brand performing in AI searches?
2. How can we improve our positioning?

4.1 How Well Is My Brand Performing in AI Searches?

The agent must:

• Generate at least 5 high-intent queries relevant to the brand
  • Example: "Best international business programs"
  • Example: "Top tools for product teams"
• Query at least 2 AI systems or search tools live (LLM APIs, Perplexity, web search + synthesis, etc.)

From these responses, the agent must extract:

• Whether the brand is mentioned
• Which competitors are mentioned
• Position / order in the answer
• Sentiment (positive, neutral, negative)

Compute a simple Share of Model score:

• % of queries where the brand appears
• Relative frequency vs competitors

And surface evidence, including:

• The actual raw responses
• URLs used
• Citation references (e.g., which sources supported which conclusions)

4.2 How Can We Improve Our Positioning?

The agent must:

• Analyze why competitors are ranking, e.g.:
  • Wikipedia presence?
  • Domain authority?
  • More backlinks?
  • Structured data / schema?
  • Press mentions?
• Identify content gaps, e.g.:
  • Missing comparison pages?
  • No listicle presence?
  • No third-party validation?

Then automatically generate:

• A draft Wikipedia-style summary (if appropriate)
• A comparison page outline
• A suggested SEO / GEO content strategy
• Structured data (schema) recommendations

Finally, prioritize actions, such as:

• High impact / Low effort
• Medium impact / High effort

This must be programmatic, not manually typed advice.

5. What Makes This an AGENT (Not Just a Script)

The GEO Agent should:

• Dynamically generate queries
• Loop over tools (LLM APIs, search APIs, scraping, etc.)
• Decide next actions based on intermediate results
• Aggregate findings across queries and systems
• Produce a structured report

Nice-to-have / bonus capabilities:

• Tool calling / tool orchestration
• Retry and fallback logic
• Model comparison (e.g., different LLMs / search engines)
• Autonomous research loops
• Monitoring / re-runnable pipeline over time

6. Expected Demo Format

At demo time, you must show:

Input:

• Brand name
• Target customer segment (optional)
• A live run of the agent

Output:

• Share of Model score
• Competitor comparison table
• Evidence citations (links, quoted passages, raw responses)
• Action plan (prioritized recommendations)
• Generated content example (e.g., wiki summary, comparison page outline)
• Architecture overview (2–3 minutes)

7. Judging Criteria

Reliability (30%)

• Uses live data and real APIs
• Provides proper citations
• Produces repeatable results
• Shows transparent reasoning (how conclusions were reached)

Insight Quality (25%)

• Findings are non-obvious and interesting
• Competitor analysis is real, not generic
• Strategy logically follows from evidence

Technical Robustness (25%)

• Quality of tool orchestration
• Level of automation
• Error handling strategy
• Model usage sophistication (e.g., multi-step reasoning, multiple providers)

Clarity to the CEO (20%)

• Non-technical execs can understand the output
• Report is structured and easy to scan
• Strategy is concrete and actionable

8. What Winning Teams Usually Do

Winning teams typically:

• Build a query generator → evaluator → synthesizer pipeline
• Compare multiple LLMs / search providers
• Extract structured entities (brands, competitors, rankings, sentiment) from responses
• Build a scoring framework for Share of Model
• Produce a polished, "consultant-style" report

Teams that struggle often:

• Just ask a single LLM once
• Manually copy/paste results
• Skip citations
• Over-focus on UI instead of reasoning and evidence

9. Optional Advanced Layer (If Time Allows)

If the core MVP is complete, consider:

• Tracking Share of Model over time
• Detecting misinformation (incorrect statements about the brand)
• Monitoring new competitor emergence
• Suggesting PR placements and outreach opportunities
• Building a lightweight dashboard for ongoing monitoring

• Creativity
  How original and insightful is the approach?
• Commercializability
  Could a real company pay for this tomorrow?
• Technically Sound
  Is this technically sound and real?
• Presentation
  Did you communicate the value clearly?